Posted by jg/oz on September 26, 2001 at 22:53:29: via: or 203.108.0.59
In Reply to: My take on that article. posted by Brad Herrick on September 26, 2001 at 21:14:02:
Could not have answered any better --10 out of ten.
What about the second fire you know about my dear answerer on my question. I think we may have to send this storey (traceable) to the "BS" section, any traceable evidence, police, EPA, fines etc etc.
Anybody any information,????????????????????????
George would you like to comment about the 24% HCs, tried to use a couple of times a system or refrigerant analyser but results were normally poor.( +/- 5 % must have been a very expensive device!!!
normally a gas chromatograph cost in the vacinity of approx A$20.000
to 50.000 and in this price-class is as accurate as +/-10%).
Love to hear from more people--
What we are after is serious accidents-hospitals etc, it seems that "Chemicalia" is killing the whole HC industry with their continious
interfering in all established so called "learned forums' like IPPC
and TEAP . Although in the USA (600 Tons of HC refrigerant is used on a yearly basis and in Australia approx 50 Ton at present) even your "Alternative Refrigerant Forum at SAE [Society of Automotive Engineers] does not even talk anymore about HCs in MACs . HCs seem to be the best alternative solution to Global Warming caused by
MAC airconditioning fluids. Easely retrofit to any system and saves 10% AC energy on the long run.
Because of this we have to find out after 10 years of use (OZ Technology started in 1991 in Idaho USA with the substance) what are the accidents which causes every USA regulatory body to be against HCs. We think we have approx 23 million user years in the USA without accidents( so far) and would like to know about any/any accident(s)
Please help-- preferred traceable and no -BS-
thanks jg/oz